Hello World, today I am
going to tell you why Nicholas Sparks’ books do not deserve the title of
literary merit. A book and or author of literary merit for those of you who do
not know are the Jane Austin’s and Charles Dickens of the world. A work of
literary merit is a novel or poem that entices the reader whether it be with
old English or a strange chronological order as seen in Ralph Ellison's novel Invisible
Man. The way I compare a novel to a work of literary merit is by looking at
two of my favorite authors, Nicholas Sparks and then one of my other favorites
F. Scott Fitzgerald and compare the differences of their novels. Nicholas spark
books are extremely predictable (why I love them so much). Boy meets girl, they
fall in love, something terrible happens and it ends in death or working
through the tough times together. Sparks demonstrates the stereotypical modern
love story. While Fitzgerald is praised for his love story and his novel is a
work of literary merit. Why is that? You must all be asking. It is due to the
literary cannon that is used; the unknowing of what will happen next in the novel
and the complexity of the characters personality and the events
that take place. A work of literary merit is considered an exceptional piece of
work and one that students can be tested on. When you think about it, the AP
Exam would be extremely easy if they were testing you on the plot and
complexity of the characters in Nicholas sparks array of romantic novels. The
AP Exam chooses works of art that they feel are going to challenge the reader
and make them question every aspect in the novel, all the hidden meanings. A
work of literary merit is one that will keep you up at night, horrified of the
actions of one of the characters and in tears at another’s because there is such
complexity.
Until next
time J
